WHAT WAS YOUR PATH INTO LAW AND ONTO THE BENCH?

Chance! Unlike many lawyers, I did not dream of a career in law, but rather in literature. However, I chose to study law to acquire a solid basic training, even if it meant branching off to another sector of activity. And against all odds, the law conquered me. As for accession to the judiciary, it was achieved through my various professional involvements, as well as in the community in general, which had the effect of distinguishing me. And since an important part of the work of judges consists of writing, writing and more writing, I can say that I managed to reconcile my interests!

WHAT EXPERIENCE IN YOUR LEGAL CAREER BEST PREPARED YOU FOR WORK ON THE BENCH?

I mainly practiced in labor and administrative law, but I also worked in civil law and civil liberties law. In addition, I have always practiced in a small firm in a metropolis and have had clients from multiple backgrounds. I believe that the diversified nature of my practice, both from the point of view of the subject areas and the clientele served, has prepared me to exercise the role of a versatile judge in a common law court.

WHAT ADVICE DO YOU HAVE FOR COUNSEL WHO APPEAR BEFORE YOU?

Intellectual honesty seems to me an essential quality. Lawyers who attempt to mislead the court or take an exaggerated stance are doing their client a disservice. In addition, lawyers benefit from being adequately prepared for the administration of their evidence, but also for their pleadings. They should not underestimate the impression that emerges from good or bad preparation.

WHAT DO YOU WISH THE PUBLIC KNEW ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM?

The Canadian public should know that the rule of law is a privilege that many societies do not have. In this sense, it must not be taken for granted, and we must help to fight against any form of attack on judicial independence.