Articles

CBA Members

Propriété
intellectuelle

Section du droit de la propriĂ©tĂ© intellectuelle de l’ABC

Les articles de la Section du droit de la propriĂ©tĂ© intellectuelle de l’ABC sont publiĂ©s par la Section du droit de la propriĂ©tĂ© intellectuelle. Les membres qui souhaitent proposer des articles sont invitĂ©s Ă  les envoyer Ă  la section Ă  : droitproprieteintellectuelleABC@cba.org.

AujourdÊŒhui
AujourdÊŒhui

Case Summary: Motion to strike testimony given at trial granted in part

  • 19 mai 2021
  • Cheryl Cheung

This decision dealt with a motion brought by Munchkin Inc. and Munchkin Baby Canada, Ltd. (collectively, “Munchkin”), the defendants in the main action, to strike certain testimony of two witnesses presented by the plaintiffs, Angelcare Canada Inc., Edgewell Personal Care ULC and Playtex Products, LLC (collectively, “Angelcare”) at trial.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case Summary: Federal Court dismisses appeal of TMOB decision rejecting ground of opposition based on resemblance to official mark

  • 19 mai 2021
  • William S. Foster

Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario (“CPA Ontario”) appealed, under section 56 of the Trademarks Act, a decision of the TMOB made on behalf of the Registrar of Trademarks rejecting CPA Ontario’s opposition to an application for the mark THIS WAY TO CPA (the “Mark”) filed by the respondent, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”).

Propriété intellectuelle

Case Summary: Obvious-to-try analysis successful in finding invalidity

  • 14 mai 2021
  • Mackenzie Jamieson

Janssen brought this infringement action against Apotex pursuant to section 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations. The patent at issue, the ‘422 Patent, related to the combination of abiraterone acetate [AA] and prednisone [PN] for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case Summary: Additional insight into the tests related to Anticipation and Utility

  • 14 mai 2021
  • Fiona Wong and Pablo Tseng

This was an action for infringement of Canadian Patent 2,800,746 (the 746 Patent). The patent is related to pressure assisted oil recovery. Swist alleged that MEG’s use of its heavy oil extraction methods infringed the 746 Patent. MEG counterclaimed that the 746 Patent was invalid.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case Summary: Admitting further evidence after parties have closed their cases

  • 14 mai 2021
  • Ashley Brown and Pablo Tseng

In the midst of a patent infringement trial, Videotron brought a motion to reopen the evidentiary portion of the trial to allow the parties to adduce additional expert evidence relating to accounting of profits. Both parties had presented evidence relating to the account of profits remedy using the incremental cost approach.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case Summary: Reconsideration of validity and infringement issues

  • 14 mai 2021
  • Fiona Wong and Pablo Tseng

In the original action (see 2018 FC 259), Hospira sought to impeach Canada Patent No. 2,261,630 (the 630 Patent). Kennedy Trust counterclaimed for infringement of that patent, which provided treatment to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other autoimmune disorders who did not respond properly to common drugs (IRs).

Propriété intellectuelle