Articles

CBA Members

Propriété
intellectuelle

Section du droit de la propriété intellectuelle de l’ABC

Les articles de la Section du droit de la propriĂ©tĂ© intellectuelle de l’ABC sont publiĂ©s par la Section du droit de la propriĂ©tĂ© intellectuelle. Les membres qui souhaitent proposer des articles sont invitĂ©s Ă  les envoyer Ă  la section Ă  : droitproprieteintellectuelleABC@cba.org.

AujourdĘĽhui
AujourdĘĽhui

Case summary: Federal Court enforces interim order in copyright infringement suit

  • 18 novembre 2024
  • Homira Haqani

In this case, the Plaintiffs sought an order from the Federal Court (“FC”) to find Marshall Macciacchera, along with his companies, in contempt of court for failing to comply with an Interim Order related to a copyright infringement dispute. The Interim Order, issued on June 28, 2022, required the defendants to disclose financial information and assist in accessing assets related to the alleged infringement.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case summary: Consequences of failing to respond to a summary judgement motion

  • 18 novembre 2024
  • Julianna Felendzer

This successful motion for summary judgment in a copyright infringement proceeding pertains to General Entertainment and Music Inc. (“GEM”) infringing on Kanal D’s (“Kanal”) copyright in 2,729 episodes of Kanal D Programs (the “Programs”).

Propriété intellectuelle

Case summary: Federal Court orders interim domain blocking injunction against ISP’s

  • 18 novembre 2024
  • Kathryn Zanetti

The Plaintiff, Indigo Books & Music Inc. brought a motion for an interim and/or interlocutory injunction against unidentified Defendants to immediately: (1) take down and cease operating a number of websites and social media accounts which used the term “indigokillskids” (“IKK Platforms”) – including the domains www.indigokillskids.com and www.indigokillskids.ca; and (2) cease infringing activities on any other platform.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case summary: FC pleading requirements where s. 53 of Patent Act (Material Misrepresentation) alleged

  • 18 novembre 2024
  • Cheryl Cheung

This Order dealt with a motion brought by the Defendant for leave pursuant to Rule 75 of the Federal Courts Rules (the “Rules”) to amend its Second Amended Statement of Defence in two proceedings. Both proceedings were commenced under ss. 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations, SOR/93-133 (the “Regulations”).

Propriété intellectuelle