Canadian Bar Association, British Columbia About   Articles Registry   Contact   Directory   Events   Join/Renew   Public/Media  
CBA.org Home

 

Fighting Discrimination in the Profession
Letters to the Editor
From the President
Practice Talk
Section Talk
Legislative Update
From the Bench
Multi-Disciplinary Practice Update
CBA Annual Conference
Holding Up the Mirror
Provincial Council
Your Organization’s Business Plan
In the Box
Law Week
Ask the Registrar
Events
Provincial News
Kudos
National News
Partners
Back to Archive

Bookmark and Share



 Letters to the Editor

Re: BarTalk, April 1999, Page 15
The April 1999 BarTalk column, “Workers’ Compensation in BC: The Royal Commission’s Final Report” states that “Neither the Canadian Bar Association, the Law Society of British Columbia, nor the Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia made any submissions to the Commission.” This statement is inaccurate insofar as the Trial Lawyers Association is concerned. In fact, the TLABC made both oral and written submissions to the Commission. I enclose for your information a copy of the written submission dated January 30, 1998, submitted by Robert Brun on behalf of TLABC.

Ed Montague
Trial Lawyers Association of BC


Reply to Ed Montague
The Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia filed an eight page written submission to the Royal Commission on Workers’ Compensation. It appeared orally on 16 May 1997.

The TLABC’s brief is referenced as item D-PAS-OO8.1 at p. 52 of Volume III, chapter 1 of the Report. It was prepared by Robert C. Brun 604.683.2466. My apologies to the TLABC and Mr. Brun for this error. The TLABC recommended:

1. The abolition of the arbitrary compensation ceiling;
2. Vocational rehabilitation improvements;
3. An independent right of final appeal;
4. Easier access to the Courts;
5. Improvements in timeliness of appeal decisions; and
6. Costs and disbursement awards.

The Royal Commission recommended (2), (3) and (5) but recommended specifically against (1), (4) and (6). Its form of recommendation for an independent final appeal body has, however, not generated any enthusiasm from lawyers and disabled workers.

Craig Paterson
Paterson & Associates


These letters were published in the June 1999 issue of BarTalk.


 

   Copyright © 2012 The Canadian Bar Association

Terms of Use & Disclaimer  |  Privacy Policy