This Order and Reasons dealt with a motion brought by Apotex a few days before trial to amend its Further Amended Statement of Defence (the “Defence”).

This case was an application for a judicial review brought by the Applicants, Bayer Inc. and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., for a review of a decision by the Minister of Health, issued through the Office of Submissions and Intellectual Property (OSIP), relating to the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) (PMNOC) Regulations.

Allergan and AbbVie successfully defended Juno’s invalidity attacks in this patent infringement action relating to the 691 Patent.

This is an appeal of a decision of the Federal Court in 2022 FC 1042, in which Justice Zinn dismissed Dragona Carpet Supplies Mississauga Inc.’s (“Dragona Mississauga”) claim against Dragona Carpet Supplies Ltd. and associated defendants (“Dragona Scarborough”).

This decision involves an appeal by Harley Davidson Motor Company, Inc. (“HDMC”) of the Registrar’s decisions in two proceedings under section 45 of the Trademarks Act.

This case involves a patent infringement action where the Plaintiff (McCain) alleges that its patent for a vegetable and fruit treatment process has been infringed by the Defendants (Simplot).

This case involves civil contempt proceedings against Antonio Macciacchera for violating court Orders related to SSTV Services.

On application by the Defendant for summary judgment, the Court dismissed the claims against the individual Defendant and one of the corporate Defendants, detailing reasons why the Plaintiff has not raised any proper cause of action.

In the context of two patent infringement actions under the PM(NOC) Regulations, the Defendant, Sandoz Canada Inc., brought motions for an Order requiring the Plaintiffs to serve fact evidence pertaining to the invention story of their patents, including any inventor evidence, prior to the date by which the Defendant’s in-chief expert reports on invalidity were to be served.

This case involves an appeal under section 56 of the Trademarks Act, in which the Opposition Board refused an application for the trademark FORNO MAGNIFICO & Design (“ICI Trademark”) in association with pizza ovens and pizza crusts.